Running list of wines posted here, in what is basically a re-post of the Table Of Contents for this blog, now current through 2018.
Of note, this is the 5th year I’ve been doing this and as I write this, I have a single wine left to post.
As usual, there is no weighting here, so this is chronological order only.
01) Martini & Rossi Asti
02) Navarro Correas Colección Privada [Malbec]
03) Concannon Crimson & Clover [Blend]
04) Fat Bastard Chardonnay
05) Penfold Koonunga Hill Shiraz-Cabernet
06) Bouchard Chardonnay
07) Colosi Sicilia Rosso [Nero d'Avola]
08) Terredora DiPaolo Aglianico
09) Marqués de Cáceres Crianza Rioja [Blend]
10) A By Acacia Pinot Noir
11) Dark Horse Big Red Blend
12) Columbia Crest Grand Estate Merlot
13) Apothic Red [Blend]
14) Penfold Koonunga Hill Shiraz
15) Sean Minor Pinot Noir Carneros
16) Castello Del Poggio Moscato
17) Atrea Old Soul Red [Blend]
18) Meiomi Pinot Noir
19) Montebuena Rioja [Tempranillo]
20) Sean Minor Cabernet Sauvignon
21) Peralillo Arenal Carmenere
22) Zantho St. Laurent
23) Clean Slate Riesling
24) Gloria Reynolds Tinto Real [Blend]
25) Prunotto Fiulot Barbera D’Asti
26) Menage A Trois [Blend]
27) Fantini Farnese Montepulciano D'Abruzzo
28) Rosenblum Vintner’s Cuvée XXXVI [Zinfandel]
29) Sean Minor Sauvignon Blanc
30) Michael David Sixth Sense Syrah
31) Borja Borsao Tinto Seleccion [Garnacha]
32) 19 Crimes [Blend]
33) Fat Bastard Cabernet Sauvignon
34) Tait Ball-Buster [Blend]
35) Bouchard Pinot Noir
36) Francis Ford Coppola Claret [Blend]
37) Chaucer's Mead
38) Bogle Essential Red [Blend]
39) Terra-Bossa Shiraz
40) Juan Gil 12 Meses [Monastrell]
41) Terra del Nero d'Avola
42) Waterbrook Melange Red
43) E. Guigal Côtes du Rhône Rouge [Blend]
44) Château Damase Bordeaux Supérieur [Merlot]
45) Château Tour d'Auron Bordeaux Supérieur [Blend]
46) Delas Côtes du Rhône Saint-Esprit [Blend]
47) Carnivor Cabernet Sauvignon
48) Chateau Giscours Petite Sirene [Blend]
49) Château Recougne Bordeaux Supérieur [Blend]
50) Menage A Trois Midnight [Blend]
51) Toasted Head Untamed Red [Blend]
52) Alexander Valley Sin Zin [Zinfandel]
53) Cupcake Black Forest [Blend]
54) Big Red Monster [Blend]
55) Menage A Trois Silk [Blend]
56) Ergo Rioja [Blend]
57) Pizzella Malbec
58) Neil Ellis Pinotage
59) Ramon Bilbao Limited [Tempranillo]
60) Moonstone Asian Pear Sake
61) Columbia Composition [Blend]
62 Ferrari-Carano Siena [Blend]
Sunday, December 30, 2018
Thursday, December 20, 2018
Issue LXII: Ferrari-Carano Siena Edition
Ferrari-Carano Siena [Blend]
When most of us think Ferrari, we think of exotic Italian sports cars, hyper cars capable of obscene speeds that mustachioed men with dark hair ramble around Hawaii in, but this case, it’s well applied to both the various estates making up this winery and the wines themselves, which take aim squarely at the higher end, perhaps echoing the cars. As to the story goes, Don Carano, who founded the vineyard with his wife Rhonda, meant it to be for his Italian grandmother, who had the same surname, but the extra nod to the sports car maker from the same country certainly didn’t hurt and was probably intentional, considering both the Caranos were strong in advertising and marketing backgrounds. It’s an interesting side note, if nothing else, but irrelevant compared to what’s in the actual bottles.
Long have I eyed those bottles on the racks, passing them by time and again because they fell too far over the HSC’s $20 upper limit. At times, I will blow by that if there is a wine I really want to try, but too often it has just been me paying more without a commensurate increase in quality and in those cases, I would have been better served to fall back to my standard bearer, the Dark Horse Big Red Blend. Also, I try to restrict my purchases to the list criteria (see first post). The HSC is not solely for fun, after all, but is meant to be practical as well. So, much joy and zero hesitation when I found it on SPA, which put it just below the upper limit for the HSC pricing entry point.
The wine did not, in any way, disappoint. While it was perhaps not everything I would have wanted it to be, it is, to my knowledge, the first to contain the Sangiovese. In this blend, we also see Malbec, Cabernet Sauvignon & Petite Sirah to round things out. The taste is a bit difficult to describe easily, so you may want to get a couple bottles to more come to terms with it. This applies if you change years, as this is a bit of an inconsistent wine, with variations from year to year, following the grapes. Ferrari-Carano refers to it as a “chameleon”, clever of them, but I doubt anything less than top notch would be allowed to be stocked with their label on it, so no fears there.
The bottle I had was very easy sipping, but additionally rather complex and I kept trying to pin down a lot of the tasting notes. Certainly somewhat fruity, but not in at all a sugary way, with elements of chocolate, cherry and the darker berries having a presence, but some additional elements, such as perhaps a nutmeg or cola in there as well. It is very smooth and elegant in the mouth, refined, with a strong depth and one of the better finishes of almost anything else on the list.
If I see this again on SPA, I will definitely re-stock, but if it’s not on SPA, it is cost-prohibitive to this list, so it is then SPA only. I would, of course, drink it again without hesitation, SPA or not, but in keeping with the guidelines, this is more a factor of necessity. This definitely feels splurge-y, without a high splurge cost attached and if your leaning is more towards wine enthusiast, this is definitely one not to miss if you haven’t yet experienced it.
When most of us think Ferrari, we think of exotic Italian sports cars, hyper cars capable of obscene speeds that mustachioed men with dark hair ramble around Hawaii in, but this case, it’s well applied to both the various estates making up this winery and the wines themselves, which take aim squarely at the higher end, perhaps echoing the cars. As to the story goes, Don Carano, who founded the vineyard with his wife Rhonda, meant it to be for his Italian grandmother, who had the same surname, but the extra nod to the sports car maker from the same country certainly didn’t hurt and was probably intentional, considering both the Caranos were strong in advertising and marketing backgrounds. It’s an interesting side note, if nothing else, but irrelevant compared to what’s in the actual bottles.
Long have I eyed those bottles on the racks, passing them by time and again because they fell too far over the HSC’s $20 upper limit. At times, I will blow by that if there is a wine I really want to try, but too often it has just been me paying more without a commensurate increase in quality and in those cases, I would have been better served to fall back to my standard bearer, the Dark Horse Big Red Blend. Also, I try to restrict my purchases to the list criteria (see first post). The HSC is not solely for fun, after all, but is meant to be practical as well. So, much joy and zero hesitation when I found it on SPA, which put it just below the upper limit for the HSC pricing entry point.
The wine did not, in any way, disappoint. While it was perhaps not everything I would have wanted it to be, it is, to my knowledge, the first to contain the Sangiovese. In this blend, we also see Malbec, Cabernet Sauvignon & Petite Sirah to round things out. The taste is a bit difficult to describe easily, so you may want to get a couple bottles to more come to terms with it. This applies if you change years, as this is a bit of an inconsistent wine, with variations from year to year, following the grapes. Ferrari-Carano refers to it as a “chameleon”, clever of them, but I doubt anything less than top notch would be allowed to be stocked with their label on it, so no fears there.
The bottle I had was very easy sipping, but additionally rather complex and I kept trying to pin down a lot of the tasting notes. Certainly somewhat fruity, but not in at all a sugary way, with elements of chocolate, cherry and the darker berries having a presence, but some additional elements, such as perhaps a nutmeg or cola in there as well. It is very smooth and elegant in the mouth, refined, with a strong depth and one of the better finishes of almost anything else on the list.
If I see this again on SPA, I will definitely re-stock, but if it’s not on SPA, it is cost-prohibitive to this list, so it is then SPA only. I would, of course, drink it again without hesitation, SPA or not, but in keeping with the guidelines, this is more a factor of necessity. This definitely feels splurge-y, without a high splurge cost attached and if your leaning is more towards wine enthusiast, this is definitely one not to miss if you haven’t yet experienced it.
Friday, November 23, 2018
Issue LXI: Columbia Composition Edition
Columbia Composition [Blend]
This one is danger, in some respects. Let’s examine those. Firstly, it passes the Marissa Ross test quite handily. This is definitely one of the few reds that could be considered “open & chug”. While it does much better with a touch of air time, it is silky smooth right out of the gate. I’ve had much lighter wines that were considerably less smooth than this and it really is quite amazing for a red. There is little to no bite to this, which I found especially interesting. Taste is also spectacular. The blend is mostly Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Syrah, so some big, bold bruisers of grapes, with the Syrah, one of my favorites, doing most of the heavy lifting here. The Cabernet is the largest percentage, but it definitely tastes and feels a bit smoother than the Cabs tend to be. There are also elements of Malbec and Petit Verdot to round things out. This entry is clearly meant to show the artistry of blending, which is done to great effect here. Varied vintages are also utilized.
The vast majority of the HSC List is from California. I don’t think it is more than everything else put together (as of this writing, there are 61 wines total on the list, 27 of which are from CA), but it is by far the single-biggest region represented on this list. It is in no danger of being surpassed, but it often overshadows another stellar U.S. entry and that of Washington, which has a lot to offer. Seeing more and more entries like this will definitely do much to get the name out there, I think, though, of course, quite a few people are already in the know.
While I wouldn’t put this quite at my overall favorite, I loved it from the first sip, right out of the gate and my appreciation has only grown since then. It is clearly a Standard, as I have bought it repeatedly, regardless of being on SPA or not (I honestly have not noticed) and the price is moderate enough that I will happily do so. This is also one of those few wines I would suggest to people who are unsure or don’t think the like either wines or reds. Very accessible.
This one is danger, in some respects. Let’s examine those. Firstly, it passes the Marissa Ross test quite handily. This is definitely one of the few reds that could be considered “open & chug”. While it does much better with a touch of air time, it is silky smooth right out of the gate. I’ve had much lighter wines that were considerably less smooth than this and it really is quite amazing for a red. There is little to no bite to this, which I found especially interesting. Taste is also spectacular. The blend is mostly Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and Syrah, so some big, bold bruisers of grapes, with the Syrah, one of my favorites, doing most of the heavy lifting here. The Cabernet is the largest percentage, but it definitely tastes and feels a bit smoother than the Cabs tend to be. There are also elements of Malbec and Petit Verdot to round things out. This entry is clearly meant to show the artistry of blending, which is done to great effect here. Varied vintages are also utilized.
The vast majority of the HSC List is from California. I don’t think it is more than everything else put together (as of this writing, there are 61 wines total on the list, 27 of which are from CA), but it is by far the single-biggest region represented on this list. It is in no danger of being surpassed, but it often overshadows another stellar U.S. entry and that of Washington, which has a lot to offer. Seeing more and more entries like this will definitely do much to get the name out there, I think, though, of course, quite a few people are already in the know.
While I wouldn’t put this quite at my overall favorite, I loved it from the first sip, right out of the gate and my appreciation has only grown since then. It is clearly a Standard, as I have bought it repeatedly, regardless of being on SPA or not (I honestly have not noticed) and the price is moderate enough that I will happily do so. This is also one of those few wines I would suggest to people who are unsure or don’t think the like either wines or reds. Very accessible.
Monday, October 1, 2018
Issue LX: Moonstone Asian Pear Sake Edition
Moonstone Asian Pear Sake
Going away from the reds and more traditional grape wines
for a bit, we have this delightful entries. Sake is one of my most favorite
comfort wines and I will happily knock through it, nice and warm (never
actually hot) nearly anytime, including summer, even if the sake isn’t all that
great. It is the first thing I reach for when I’m ill and if there is a wine
that transcends the HSC list in general, it is this type, as I loved it from
the jump and have never stopped. It is one my wife (see earliest posts of this
blog) does not seem to have any great fondness for, so it operates largely
outside of the list.
Sake, with fermented rice as the base, has its own distinct
character and variations, much like the appellations of the other wines here. This
particular one is very light and fruity and could function well as a dessert
wine. To my regret, a number of the liquor stores around don’t stock it and
it’s one I have to be somewhat careful not to buy large amounts of, as I will
happily consume it and keep going. The Momokawa (another excellent sake) is the
base for the Moonstones and this one, to me, adds just enough of a light splash
of Pear for it to be named that, but is definitely harder leaning towards sake
rather than a fruity drink.
Moonstone is clearly intending this to be closer to a
dessert wine, perhaps thinking more wine cooler, with the ad description:
“Imagine reaching up and picking a perfectly ripe pear off the tree, chilling
it down and enjoying it simple and clean.” This description, incidentally, is
somewhat false and really stretching, best case. This definitely does hit the
Asian pear notes, though, which are much more subtle and lighter than the
regular Bartlett pears, for instance. Light, refreshing and very satisfying,
definitely one of my all-around favorites…somewhat dangerously so, though I
suspect if I actually just went for it with a bottle, I probably would tire of the taste
somewhat quickly.
As with all non-red wines, the usual rating scale does not
apply here. I will say that this, like a number of sakes available, is very
moderately priced, usually between $ 12 - $14 a bottle for this one.
Unquestionably, well worth that.
Sunday, July 22, 2018
Issue LIX: Ramon Bilbao Limited Edition
Ramon Bilbao Limited [Tempranillo]
This is an interesting entry, as I’ve had the wines of this
label over the course of a few different years, so perhaps this could be
several reviews in one. I don’t generally note the years, but here, it may be
bear noting as they are not always very similar. It is indeed different every
time, but never in the least unpleasant and usually one of my better pick-ups.
Due to the smaller quantities involved, it is frequently not available, so when
I see it, usually I’ll grab a bottle or more.
It is no small task to vary your small batch wine from year
to year and still come up with outstanding results, so a huge tip of the hat to
these guys for doing it. This is also fermented in oak barrels, rather than
vats, then matured in oak, then after that in bottles before being released, so
this is not, in any way, any sort of production wine. That it falls on this
list at all is something of a marvel to me, actually.
The wines of this line tend to be on the darker side, a
trait I admire immensely. The years I’ve had this have been rich and lush and
generally fruity, though with a good solid amount of tannin that is assertive
initially but smooths out rather quickly. This one could pass the vaunted
Marissa Ross test, for instance. It naturally does better with air and can bit
a touch pungent out of the gate, though not overbearingly so. There are indeed
some universals and those traits, along with the Tempranillo grape, are generally
common amidst the various varietal years.
The flavor profile, though, tends to be notably different. 2013,
for example, was very full and very rich, lush, delightful, tasty and quite
pleasing and satisfying to the palate. It is noted as intended to “go with
anything”, which I think it probably would. We never use wine to accompany
food, but it was a great chill out and relax drink, an exceptional “sipping
companion”, as it were. The 2011, on the other hand, was considerably more
complex, with several notes happening all at once. The 2013 was far smoother,
with perhaps hints of other flavors, but with precious little of the earlier
busyness, what you would call more “straight ahead.” Both of them were
wonderful and I’d be well happy to have a bottle of either.
As you may have surmised from where this is going, this is
definitely a Standard. If I see it, I get it, SPA or not be damned and I
definitely encourage you to do the same. Truly one of the greats.
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Issue LVIII: Neil Ellis Pinotage Edition
Neil Ellis Pinotage
Part of the beauty of this series, for me, anyway, is that I
am able to be motivated to really reach out and be exposed to such a great
collective of worldly wines and learn a great deal about varietals whose
existence I was not previously aware. In this case, we travel to South Africa
and a varietal of Pinot Noir, which you no doubt guessed already and a grape
called Cinsaut, which had another name in the region, Hermitage, hence the new
name for the new cross-bred varietal.
Pinotage, however, is a very volatile grape and it is one
that takes a great deal of care and tweaking to make palatable, sort of like
the exquisite massaging one would need to do to juggle liquid nitroglycerine,
for example. I may be overstating it, but historical records have not been kind
to some of the end result. In this case, though, we have a nice and smoky
flavor, along with a touch of both astringency and effervescence, which I found
endlessly delightful. The flavor seems modest but allow it to linger and you
find a deep well of power hidden beneath the surface. This is a very complex
wine and expect some of the darker berry fruits, perhaps with a dash of plum
and very slight cherry for flavoring notes, along with that smoke and a bit of
leather as well.
Mouth feel is where things really get intriguing, both with
the slight carbonated aspect (it is not, however, an actual carbonated wine,
such as a real sparkling white or champagne. By no means should that be read
into this, it is very slight and utterly pleasant, a brilliant and refreshing
change of pace) as well as the wine skirting the edge between being light and
have some solid mouth feel. Tannins are definitely present, but quite far from
assertive. Altogether, this is one of the more pleasant wines I’ve experience
and puts South Africa back on the radar for me, having been off of it for quite
some time after several wines from that regions striking me as misfires.
At the price point, this is a great bargain. I don’t
anticipate you would keep all the wonderful characteristics cellaring it (and I
can’t imagine what hoops that would require one to jump through) and I don’t do
any of that, in any case, so this is much more immediate. I have not seen this
on SPA, but again, I don’t usually wander into this region in the store, so it
may be and I’ve just not noticed. It is one of my new favorites, though, so it
is beyond a Mixed…therefore South Africa puts itself on the HSC list with a
bang…coming in as a Standard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)